This name appears only on the list supplied by the Library. I am not sure when it was done, but supposedly they saw a stone that stated Margaret wife of Reuben. I found no tombstone like this.
I checked census and Reuben Brookbank's wife was not Margaret in 1850 and since I found no stone for Reuben Brookbank and he died in 1854 and his wife was not Margaret in 1850, I would assume she was the wife of another Reuben or possible 1st wife of Reuben Brookbank and died before 1850. NO PROOF OF WHO SHE WAS or if she were truly buried here.
I checked census and Reuben Brookbank's wife was not Margaret in 1850 and since I found no stone for Reuben Brookbank and he died in 1854 and his wife was not Margaret in 1850, I would assume she was the wife of another Reuben or possible 1st wife of Reuben Brookbank and died before 1850. NO PROOF OF WHO SHE WAS or if she were truly buried here.
This name appears only on the list supplied by the Library. I am not sure when it was done, but supposedly they saw a stone that stated Margaret wife of Reuben. I found no tombstone like this.
I checked census and Reuben Brookbank's wife was not Margaret in 1850 and since I found no stone for Reuben Brookbank and he died in 1854 and his wife was not Margaret in 1850, I would assume she was the wife of another Reuben or possible 1st wife of Reuben Brookbank and died before 1850. NO PROOF OF WHO SHE WAS or if she were truly buried here.
I checked census and Reuben Brookbank's wife was not Margaret in 1850 and since I found no stone for Reuben Brookbank and he died in 1854 and his wife was not Margaret in 1850, I would assume she was the wife of another Reuben or possible 1st wife of Reuben Brookbank and died before 1850. NO PROOF OF WHO SHE WAS or if she were truly buried here.
Advertisement
Explore more
Sponsored by Ancestry
Advertisement
