Thomas married Mary W Atwell.
-------
1820 United States Federal Census
about Thomas Bastin
Name:Thomas Bastin
Home in 1820 (City, County, State):Caswell, North Carolina
Enumeration Date:August 7, 1820
Free White Persons - Males - Under 10:3
Free White Persons - Males - 26 thru 44:1
Free White Persons - Females - Under 10:1
Free White Persons - Females - 10 thru 15:3
Free White Persons - Females - 26 thru 44:1
Number of Persons - Engaged in Agriculture:1
Free White Persons - Under 16:7
Free White Persons - Over 25:2
Total Free White Persons:9
Total All Persons - White, Slaves, Colored, Other:9
-----
1850 United States Federal Census
about Thomas Basten
Name:Thomas Basten [Thomas Bastin]
Age:66
Birth Year:abt 1784
Birthplace:North Carolina
Home in 1850:Division 2, Barren, Kentucky
Gender:Male
Family Number:1116
Household Members:
Name Age
Thomas Basten 66
Mary W Basten 69
Elizabeth E Carver 16
------
Cade Kid #46926103, made a suggestion to drop the "Jr" and replace with "II". There being a "III" in the family. Ok by me, unless other object. 1/16/2018.
Thomas married Mary W Atwell.
-------
1820 United States Federal Census
about Thomas Bastin
Name:Thomas Bastin
Home in 1820 (City, County, State):Caswell, North Carolina
Enumeration Date:August 7, 1820
Free White Persons - Males - Under 10:3
Free White Persons - Males - 26 thru 44:1
Free White Persons - Females - Under 10:1
Free White Persons - Females - 10 thru 15:3
Free White Persons - Females - 26 thru 44:1
Number of Persons - Engaged in Agriculture:1
Free White Persons - Under 16:7
Free White Persons - Over 25:2
Total Free White Persons:9
Total All Persons - White, Slaves, Colored, Other:9
-----
1850 United States Federal Census
about Thomas Basten
Name:Thomas Basten [Thomas Bastin]
Age:66
Birth Year:abt 1784
Birthplace:North Carolina
Home in 1850:Division 2, Barren, Kentucky
Gender:Male
Family Number:1116
Household Members:
Name Age
Thomas Basten 66
Mary W Basten 69
Elizabeth E Carver 16
------
Cade Kid #46926103, made a suggestion to drop the "Jr" and replace with "II". There being a "III" in the family. Ok by me, unless other object. 1/16/2018.
Family Members
Advertisement
Records on Ancestry
Advertisement