Very Old Stone, dates obliterated in 1995. Not the Christopher Bartlet in who died 1747.
Someone asked "could this be the Christopher Bartlett b. 1655 d. 1711 that married Deborah Weed?" It is my opinion that it is not him, only because this cemetery was affiliated with the Old North Parish Church, and their records begin about 1730. However, it is possible he was buried there first and the cemetery grew from a few existing graves.
Someone asked "could this be the Christopher Bartlett b. 1655 d. 1711 that married Deborah Weed?" It is my opinion that it is not him, only because this cemetery was affiliated with the Old North Parish Church, and their records begin about 1730. However, it is possible he was buried there first and the cemetery grew from a few existing graves.
Very Old Stone, dates obliterated in 1995. Not the Christopher Bartlet in who died 1747.
Someone asked "could this be the Christopher Bartlett b. 1655 d. 1711 that married Deborah Weed?" It is my opinion that it is not him, only because this cemetery was affiliated with the Old North Parish Church, and their records begin about 1730. However, it is possible he was buried there first and the cemetery grew from a few existing graves.
Someone asked "could this be the Christopher Bartlett b. 1655 d. 1711 that married Deborah Weed?" It is my opinion that it is not him, only because this cemetery was affiliated with the Old North Parish Church, and their records begin about 1730. However, it is possible he was buried there first and the cemetery grew from a few existing graves.
Advertisement
Advertisement
