Her birthdate listed somewhere as "About 1770", but if that were true, she would have been having all her kids from 40-56 years old, which is possible but very unlikely. However, if she were about 20 years older than her first child, born in 1810, she would be 24 years younger than her husband. So, for a happy medium, she was probably born around 1780 to 1785.
Her birthdate listed somewhere as "About 1770", but if that were true, she would have been having all her kids from 40-56 years old, which is possible but very unlikely. However, if she were about 20 years older than her first child, born in 1810, she would be 24 years younger than her husband. So, for a happy medium, she was probably born around 1780 to 1785.
Family Members
Children
Advertisement
Explore more
Sponsored by Ancestry
Advertisement
