sons of Joel & Namee Lomis
age 16[?]
[The Hale Index has death year of 1741. If Giles died in 1765 and he is on the same stone, perhaps Joel also died the same year? And perhaps it reads 16 months and not 16 years?
Although according to the Barbour Collection for Windsor, Hartford, Connecticut: Giles Loomis died 31 August 1751
According to the Barbour Collection for Windsor, Hartford, Connecticut: Joel, son of Joel and Namee, was born 4 November 1763.
Stone needs to be examined more closely]
age 16[?]
[The Hale Index has death year of 1741. If Giles died in 1765 and he is on the same stone, perhaps Joel also died the same year? And perhaps it reads 16 months and not 16 years?
Although according to the Barbour Collection for Windsor, Hartford, Connecticut: Giles Loomis died 31 August 1751
According to the Barbour Collection for Windsor, Hartford, Connecticut: Joel, son of Joel and Namee, was born 4 November 1763.
Stone needs to be examined more closely]
sons of Joel & Namee Lomis
age 16[?]
[The Hale Index has death year of 1741. If Giles died in 1765 and he is on the same stone, perhaps Joel also died the same year? And perhaps it reads 16 months and not 16 years?
Although according to the Barbour Collection for Windsor, Hartford, Connecticut: Giles Loomis died 31 August 1751
According to the Barbour Collection for Windsor, Hartford, Connecticut: Joel, son of Joel and Namee, was born 4 November 1763.
Stone needs to be examined more closely]
age 16[?]
[The Hale Index has death year of 1741. If Giles died in 1765 and he is on the same stone, perhaps Joel also died the same year? And perhaps it reads 16 months and not 16 years?
Although according to the Barbour Collection for Windsor, Hartford, Connecticut: Giles Loomis died 31 August 1751
According to the Barbour Collection for Windsor, Hartford, Connecticut: Joel, son of Joel and Namee, was born 4 November 1763.
Stone needs to be examined more closely]
Family Members
Advertisement
Records on Ancestry
Advertisement
