Can hardly read his stone. Will need Mary Jane to give details. I assume he is another son of Rollin Carlos & Louisa Hawkins, but want it validated. Also cannot read a death date on the stone.
Notes from Mary Jane:
"I don't have proof, but I believe that Cullen Hawkins was probably a son of Rollin C. and Louisa Hawkins. The dates I have are 1850 - 1858. This child might have been born after the 1850 census was taken, so wouldn't be listed. The child also died before the 1860 census, so I don't have anything concrete to base that on except a "gut" feeling."
I hope she takes another look, I swear the birth date looks like 1859. I see a "9" not a "0".
I will add that he is their son because of the location and the style of the stone. However, I'll leave the dates alone until Mary Jane rechecks the stone photo.
Notes from Mary Jane:
"I don't have proof, but I believe that Cullen Hawkins was probably a son of Rollin C. and Louisa Hawkins. The dates I have are 1850 - 1858. This child might have been born after the 1850 census was taken, so wouldn't be listed. The child also died before the 1860 census, so I don't have anything concrete to base that on except a "gut" feeling."
I hope she takes another look, I swear the birth date looks like 1859. I see a "9" not a "0".
I will add that he is their son because of the location and the style of the stone. However, I'll leave the dates alone until Mary Jane rechecks the stone photo.
Can hardly read his stone. Will need Mary Jane to give details. I assume he is another son of Rollin Carlos & Louisa Hawkins, but want it validated. Also cannot read a death date on the stone.
Notes from Mary Jane:
"I don't have proof, but I believe that Cullen Hawkins was probably a son of Rollin C. and Louisa Hawkins. The dates I have are 1850 - 1858. This child might have been born after the 1850 census was taken, so wouldn't be listed. The child also died before the 1860 census, so I don't have anything concrete to base that on except a "gut" feeling."
I hope she takes another look, I swear the birth date looks like 1859. I see a "9" not a "0".
I will add that he is their son because of the location and the style of the stone. However, I'll leave the dates alone until Mary Jane rechecks the stone photo.
Notes from Mary Jane:
"I don't have proof, but I believe that Cullen Hawkins was probably a son of Rollin C. and Louisa Hawkins. The dates I have are 1850 - 1858. This child might have been born after the 1850 census was taken, so wouldn't be listed. The child also died before the 1860 census, so I don't have anything concrete to base that on except a "gut" feeling."
I hope she takes another look, I swear the birth date looks like 1859. I see a "9" not a "0".
I will add that he is their son because of the location and the style of the stone. However, I'll leave the dates alone until Mary Jane rechecks the stone photo.
Family Members
Advertisement
Explore more
Sponsored by Ancestry
Advertisement
