After many hours of research, I believe that I have the two wives correct. Should someone know differently, please let me know if it is wrong and why it is. The two wives are based on research of Death Certificates, Evansville City Directories and Census records.
One thing that does not quite line up in all the research, is the year of birth for both Sarah's and Peter himself. That being said, along with their son, James, all the activity occurs between 1909 and 1921 East Missouri Street over a period of nearly 30 years.
One thing that does not quite line up in all the research, is the year of birth for both Sarah's and Peter himself. That being said, along with their son, James, all the activity occurs between 1909 and 1921 East Missouri Street over a period of nearly 30 years.
After many hours of research, I believe that I have the two wives correct. Should someone know differently, please let me know if it is wrong and why it is. The two wives are based on research of Death Certificates, Evansville City Directories and Census records.
One thing that does not quite line up in all the research, is the year of birth for both Sarah's and Peter himself. That being said, along with their son, James, all the activity occurs between 1909 and 1921 East Missouri Street over a period of nearly 30 years.
One thing that does not quite line up in all the research, is the year of birth for both Sarah's and Peter himself. That being said, along with their son, James, all the activity occurs between 1909 and 1921 East Missouri Street over a period of nearly 30 years.
Inscription
CO H, 116 US CLD INF
Family Members
Sponsored by Ancestry
Advertisement
Records on Ancestry
Sponsored by Ancestry
Advertisement
